[DemStepCare: Risk-stratified support for primary care-based dementia care - evaluation from general practitioner's view]. / DemStepCare: Risikostratifizierte Unterstützung der ambulanten Demenzversorgung ­ Bewertung aus hausärztlicher Perspektive.

OBJECTIVE: The innovation fund project DemStepCare aimed to optimize multi-professional care through case management, risk stratification, and crisis outpatient clinic. Here, the evaluation results from the perspective of the general practitioners are presented. METHODS: A quantitative survey was carried out at three time points regarding acceptance, benefit assessment and sensitivity to dementia of the general practitioners. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted. RESULTS: Satisfaction with the overall project was high. Added value and relief factors were perceived and more effective and stable dementia care was achieved through collaboration with case management. Physicians reported increased subjective competence in diagnostics and disease management. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the benefit and effectiveness of DemStepCare from general practitioner's perspective.

Primary care involvement in clinical research - prerequisites, motivators, and barriers: results from a study series.

BACKGROUND: Long-term reinforcement in the role of primary care and improvement the healthcare system as a whole requires the involvement of GPs in clinical research processes. However, many clinical studies fail due to failure to achieve sample population targets amongst GPs and their patients. This issue has been identified and discussed, but effective strategies to overcome it are still lacking. One of the reasons is that the positions, requirements, and experiences of GPs on participating in clinical research have hardly been examined up to now. METHODS: The years 2021 and 2022 saw three quantitative and qualitative surveys amongst GPs in Germany with the aim of shedding light on the attitudes, experiences, and potential issues regarding the involvement of primary care in clinical research projects and participation in cluster-randomised controlled trials (cRCTs) in a general sense. This overview summarises and abstracts conclusions gained from the exploratory series of studies and compares the results with the current research situation. From here, this contribution will then develop an approach towards optimising the integration of GPs into clinical research. RESULTS: Most of the GPs asked associated clinical research with opportunities and potential such as closing gaps in healthcare, using evidence-based instruments, optimising diagnostic and therapeutic management, and reinforcement of multiprofessional healthcare. Even so, many GPs unsure as to how far primary care in particular would stand to benefit from studies of this type in the long term. Respondents were also divided on willingness to participate in clinical research. GPs having already participated in Innovation Fund projects generally saw a benefit regarding intervention and cost-benefit relationship. However, some also reported major hurdles and stress factors such as excessive documentation and enrolment requirements, greater interference in practice routines, and sometimes poor integration into project processes such as in communication and opportunities to play an active role in the project. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the studies presented provide indications as to how GPs perceive clinical research projects and cRCTs as a whole and from their existing project experience, and on the requirements that studies would have to meet for GPs to be willing to participate. In particular, making sure that clinical studies fully conform with GPs would play a major role; this especially applies to freedom to make medical decisions, limitation of documentation obligations, interference in regular practice routine, greater involvement in research planning, and long-term reinforcement in the role of primary care. Clinical research projects and cRCTs should be planned, designed, and communicated for clear and visible relevance to everyday primary care.

How are people with obesity managed in primary care? - results of a qualitative, exploratory study in Germany 2022.

BACKGROUND: Counselling and management of overweight and obesity are tasks for which general practitioners possess favourable qualifications. Based on a long-term doctor-patient relationship, GPs have various options for actions to deal with overweight problems. To date, however, there is only little evidence on the experiences which people with obesity have made with the primary physician model and the care needs and wishes they actually address to their GPs. This study investigated what experiences people with obesity have had with GP care and what care needs and wishes they communicated to their GPs. The results will be used to derive starting points for optimising the primary healthcare setting. METHODS: A total of 32 individuals affected by obesity were recruited over 24 online health forums. With them, we conducted qualitative interviews in the time between April and October 2022. RESULTS: The respondents considered the primary care physician to be the central contact person when they sought advice and support with weight problems. The advice of the GP was associated with an increased willingness to deal with reducing one's own weight. Despite this positive perception, widespread drawbacks existed from the perspective of the respondents: (1) incidental or late discovery of obesity, (2) absence of continuous weight counselling, (3) no agreement on specific weight reduction goals, (4) no referrals to help and support services, (5) insensitive discussion. Only some of the respondents who have recently been able to reduce their weight sustainably attributed their success primarily to the support they received from their GP. CONCLUSION: GPs should be encouraged to address obesity consistently and promptly. In addition, concrete recommendations and realistic goals for weight loss should be formulated. Continuous and motivating discussions are crucial in this regard. A focus on nutrition and exercise counselling in the GP's office should also be encouraged. GPs should be strengthened in their role as mediators by integrating their patients into a network of further assistance as needed. The development of care structures for obesity management should be promoted.

What requirements do primary care physicians have with regard to dementia diagnostics and dementia care? - a survey study among general practitioners in Germany 2022/2023.

BACKGROUND: General practice offers good conditions to detect and provide care for dementia-related diseases. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of dementia care in general practice is repeatedly criticised. To date, few studies have attempted to form a comprehensive picture of the status quo of dementia care in general practice that focuses on GP perspectives of experience and action. The aim of this study was to identify potential strengths and weaknesses of GP-based dementia care, by means of combined consideration of relevant care and treatment dimensions (construct of 'dementia sensitivity'). METHODS: Through an online poll, a total of 4,511 GPs who are active as treatment providers in Baden-Württemberg, Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland were surveyed between September 2022 and January 2023. In addition to the descriptive analysis, a T-test with independent samples was used to identify significant differences between two groups (interval-scaled or metric variables). Pearson's chi-squared test (χ2) was used to analyze the percentage values. Two levels of significance were tested for (mean difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001). In the course of the analysis, there were particular differences with regard to the sociodemographic variables 'urban vs. rural doctors' and 'doctors with geriatric training vs. doctors with no geriatric training'. Therefore, a complete listing of these parameters is given in the tables. In addition, the factor analysis method was employed. RESULTS: The respondents consider it important for GPs to provide care and support for dementia patients. The doctors express the desire to offer active support to patients and their family caregivers. At the same time, many GPs experience challenges and difficulties when it comes to practical diagnostic steps (in line with guidelines), the (early) identification of dementia and consistent disease management, including the anticipation of care and treatment needs. Moreover, it appears that a significant proportion of the sample has only limited confidence when it comes to review relevant help and support services. One consistent finding is that some doctors in urban practices who also have geriatric training show substantial increases in knowledge and information with regard to dementia care. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of the findings, it seems particularly advisable to strengthen the geriatric competence of GPs. Moreover, it seems to be essential to ensure that they are better informed about cooperation and support structures in the area of dementia care and better integrated into these.

Online enquiries and health concerns - a survey of German general practitioners regarding experiences and strategies in patient care.

Aim: Increasingly at GP practices, patients appear who are extremely worried as a result of health information researched online and consequently affected by doubts and concerns. The study highlights GP attitudes and experiences with regard to this patient group. Moreover, it identifies strategies adopted by GPs to respond appropriately to worried or scared patients. Subject and methods: In the German federal states of Baden-Württemberg, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland, 2532 GPs were surveyed between June and August 2022. Owing to the explorative nature of the study, a descriptive analysis was conducted. Results: Of the total respondents, 77% deemed the current problem of internet-related health concerns to be a major challenge in everyday practice. The implications affect patients' mental stability and expectations towards the doctor (esp. demand for further instrumental diagnosis, 83%). One doctor in five (20%) has experienced the termination of patient contact because the relationship with the patient was no longer possible due to the patient's uncontrolled online information behaviour. To respond to worried or scared patients, the respondents generally ask certain patient groups about online research (39%) and take this into account in the doctor-patient discussion (23%). Furthermore, the respondents use a detailed explanation of the diagnosis and/or treatment (65%) and recommend websites that they consider reputable (66%). Some of the doctors prefer a joint examination of the information researched by the patient (55%) as well as to explain the benefits and risks of online research (43%). Conclusion: Many GPs demonstrate a high level of awareness and sensitivity with regard to extensive online research and potentially worried patients. It seems advisable to actively address the online search for information in the patient consultation to prevent possible negative effects on the doctor-patient relationship and to actively involve the patient. In this respect, it would also be worth considering expanding the medical history to include the dimension of online searching. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01909-1.

How can primary care be secured in the long term? - a qualitative study from the perspective of general practitioners in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Securing primary care is an important issue for health policy. Given a threatened shortage of GPs in Germany, there are discussions about what actions to take to guarantee primary care. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to obtain opinions of German GPs towards (a) the status quo and development of primary care, (b) favoured actions to secure it and (c) assessment of the actions taken. METHODS: In 2021 and 2022, 96 semi-structured interviews (criterion sampling) amongst GPs were conducted in all German federal states (41 face-to-face, 32 by telephone, 23 via telecommunication application). The data was analysed according to qualitative content analysis. Additionally, a short questionnaire recorded the problem of GP shortage. RESULTS: Many interviewees fear a veritable shortage of GPs in the future. They identify structural problems linked to the health care system. The interviewees suggested creating a primary care physician system or upgrading the GP position. They proposed greater support of interests about general practice in education and training, a restructuring of curricula and admissions criteria in higher medical education and reforming GP training. Building up multi-professional outpatient care centres and strengthening task shifting are valuable. The interviewees have observed progress in ensuring primary care but see a need for further action. CONCLUSION: The study has shown that GPs, from their perspective and experience, make specific suggestions to ensure primary care in the long term. Consequently, it is advisable to consider their points of view when planning, implementing and adjusting steps to strengthen primary care.

Attitudes and experiences of registered diabetes specialists in using health apps for managing type 2 diabetes: results from a mixed-methods study in Germany 2021/2022.

BACKGROUND: Hardly any area of application for health apps is seen to be as promising as health and lifestyle support in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Research has emphasised the benefits of such mHealth apps for disease prevention, monitoring, and management, but there is still a lack of empirical data on the role that health apps play in actual type 2 diabetes care. The aim of the present study was to gain an overview of the attitudes and experiences of physicians specialising in diabetes with regard to the benefits of health apps for type 2 diabetes prevention and management. METHODS: An online survey was conducted amongst all 1746 physicians at practices specialised in diabetes in Germany between September 2021 and April 2022. A total of 538 (31%) of the physicians contacted participated in the survey. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 randomly selected resident diabetes specialists. None of the interviewees took part in the quantitative survey. RESULTS: Resident diabetes specialists saw a clear benefit in type 2 diabetes-related health apps, primarily citing improvements in empowerment (73%), motivation (75%), and compliance (71%). Respondents rated self-monitoring for risk factors (88%), lifestyle-supporting (86%), and everyday routine features (82%) as especially beneficial. Physicians mainly in urban practice environments were open to apps and their use in patient care despite their potential benefit. Respondents expressed reservations and doubts on app user-friendliness in some patient groups (66%), privacy in existing apps (57%), and the legal conditions of using apps in patient care (80%). Of those surveyed, 39% felt capable of advising patients on diabetes-related apps. Most of the physicians that had already used apps in patient care saw positive effects in increased compliance (74%), earlier detection of or reduction in complications (60%), weight reduction (48%), and decreased HbA1c levels (37%). CONCLUSIONS: Resident diabetes specialists saw a real-life benefit with added value from health apps for managing type 2 diabetes. Despite the favourable role that health apps may play in disease prevention and management, many physicians expressed reservations regarding usability, transparency, security, and privacy in such apps. These concerns should be addressed more intensively towards bringing about ideal conditions for integrating health apps successfully in diabetes care. This includes uniform standards governing quality, privacy, and legal conditions as binding as possible with regard to apps and their use in a clinical setting.

Promotion of Exercise and Health for Older People in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study on the Potential, Experiences and Strategies of General Practitioners in Germany.

In advanced age, physical activity becomes an important element in maintaining one's individual health. GPs are considered to be well suited for advising and attending to older patients according to the principles of (preventive) healthcare. The subject was examined in the context of a study that determined options for action, experiences and strategies relating to the physical activation of older patients by GPs. Between 2021 and 2022, 76 semi-standardised interviews amongst GPs were conducted in all federal states of Germany. The data were evaluated by qualitative content analysis. The category system includes: importance of promoting physical activity; focus of exercise counselling; procedure of counselling; overview of exercise offers and cooperation with healthcare stakeholders; challenges and optimisation approaches. Many interviewees were aware of the significance of promoting health and exercise among older persons. Some physicians paid attention to identifying suitable activities for patients and motivating them to participate on a long-term basis. Cooperations with local health stakeholders have been identified. The interviewees recognised various challenges, which were mainly attributable to the lack of structures for health promotion. Several of the GPs lacked an overview of the physical activity programmes. GPs should assume an active role in exercise and health promotion for older patients. For them to be able to refer their patients effectively to exercise opportunities offered, it will be of importance to integrate the GP setting into a community-based network of prevention. Training measures could support the GP team to refer to the value of physical activity and address need-based recommendations.

Two years of approved digital health applications in Germany - Perspectives and experiences of general practitioners with an affinity for their use.

BACKGROUND: Since 2020, physicians in Germany can prescribe approved digital health applications (DHAs) with the costs covered by the health system. There has so far been a lack of studies on attitudes and experiences amongst GPs in using DHAs. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to elucidate the experiences and observations of GPs that have used DHAs in health care and to examine the conditions necessary for DHAs to gain a foothold in primary care according to the GPs. METHODS: In 2022, 96 qualitative semi-standardised interviews were conducted with German GPs with experience in prescribing DHAs. The GPs were all organised in digitalisation-oriented physicians' associations. Fifty-four interviews were carried out in person and 42 by phone. The data were analysed according to qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Unlike health apps, the interviewees saw DHAs as reliable tools for enhancing the relationship between GPs and their patients. They saw the DHAs they had been prescribing as useful and reported various benefits, including improvements in compliance, mobility, information for patients and weight reduction. The physicians also saw room for further improvement (usability, gamification, training, information sources). Interviewees saw the inclusion of DHAs in evidence-based guidelines as a major step forward. CONCLUSION: The interviewees rated DHAs favourably regarding healthcare potential and as safer and more reliable than conventional health apps. Many saw benefits to healthcare from using such applications. From the interviewees' point of view, DHAs can be integrated more effectively into patient care.

[Clarification of increased liver values in primary care - Findings from a series of studies from a general practitioner and specialist perspective]. / Diagnostik erhöhter Leberwerte in der Primärversorgung ­ Befunde einer Studienreihe aus haus- und fachärztlicher Perspektive.

INTRODUCTION: In primary care, elevated liver values are often an incidental finding. In addition to observing symptoms, it is crucial for an effective clarification which liver values are included as indicators and when patients are referred for further diagnostics. It also depends on regular cooperation between general practitioner and specialist care level. So far, there has been a lack of reliable studies for German-speaking countries on the status quo with regard to the clarification of (unclear) elevated liver values in primary care. This overview article compresses the balance of an exploratory series of studies, the aim of which was to take stock of the general practitioner's diagnostics of (unclear) elevated liver values. Starting points for optimizing GP care are derived from the results. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2017 and 2021, four written surveys of general practitioners and gastroenterological specialists were carried out in different federal states. The present study review discusses the overall findings in a condensed manner at a higher level, but also deals with specific findings. RESULTS: When it comes to clarifying elevated liver values, there are various challenges and problems in general practitioner care. For example, GPs use widely different liver-associated laboratory parameters (95% γ-GT, 65% AST, 63% ALT) that are bundled in different clusters. In the case of elevated liver values, the majority of general practitioners prefer to wait in a controlled manner (66%), but often make use of direct and early referrals to specialists in everyday practice due to diagnostic uncertainties (40%). When working with gastroenterological specialists, there are various interface problems, which, among other things, are associated with the GP's preliminary clarification and the time of referral. Both GPs and specialists see the introduction of a structured, evidence-based diagnostic algorithm as an important approach for improving early detection and better coordination between the levels of care (80% respective 85%). DISCUSSION: It makes sense to take measures that contribute to the professionalization and standardization of general practitioner diagnostics and better structure cooperation with gastroenterological specialists. These include, for example, a broader range of training and advanced training formats, the development of a validated diagnostic pathway or the permanent establishment of a liver value-associated blood test as part of the check-up. The development of a well-founded GP-based guideline for the detection and handling of elevated liver values also appears advisable.

[What potential and added value do DiGA offer for primary care?-Results of a survey of general practitioners in Germany]. / Welche Potenziale und Mehrwerte bieten DiGA für die hausärztliche Versorgung? ­ Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Hausärzt*innen in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: For almost two years, physicians have been able to prescribe digital health applications (DiGA) to patients. So far, there has been a lack of studies that shed light on the possible use of DiGA in the context of primary care and take stock of the benefits and potential for optimization. OBJECTIVES: This study explores general practitioners' (GPs) attitudes, expectations, and experiences with regard to the application potential of DiGA. METHODS: In the spring of 2022, all 13,913 general practitioners in the federal states Baden-Württemberg, Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate, and Saarland were invited to take part in an online survey. Included in the evaluation were 3829 completed questionnaires (response rate: 28%). A t-test on independent samples was used to determine significant differences between two groups. Moreover, a factor analysis was carried out. RESULTS: A majority of those surveyed consider DiGA to be reliable (67%) and secure (61%) applications. In addition, 22% trust themselves to competently advise patients on DiGA, 14% have already prescribed DiGA, and 13% plan to do so. Of the GPs with DiGA experience, 83% rate the prescribed applications as useful. Observed healthcare effects mainly relate to the improvement of compliance (95%), mobility (94%), and education (93%) as well as weight reduction (82%). The respondents suggest further optimization of DIGA, especially with regard to usability (59%), systematic further training of doctors (52%), and the expansion of gamification elements (49%). CONCLUSIONS: It is important to better inform GPs about the basics of the Digital Healthcare Act (DVG) and to address concerns in a targeted manner. Comprehensive training courses that explain the framework conditions and advantages of using DiGA appear to be crucial. There is also a need for more well-founded sources of information and research for doctors.

Attitudes, attributions, and usage patterns of primary care patients with regard to over-the-counter drugs-a survey in Germany.

Studies show that over-the-counter drugs are widely used by consumers. Moreover, there is a huge selection available and they are prominently featured in advertising. To date, there exist only a few studies that shed light on the attitudes, attributions, and usage patterns of patients with regard to use of over-the-counter drugs. An anonymized explorative waiting room survey was conducted among 900 patients in 60 GP practices in the German states of North Rhine-Westphalia, Hesse, and Rhineland-Palatinate. As well as the descriptive analysis, a t test was applied to independent random samples, in order to identify significant differences between two groups. 65% of respondents reported using over-the-counter drugs frequently or occasionally. With regard to effects, risks, and side effects, 54% state that they usually take advice from their GP and/or pharmacist before purchasing or taking over-the-counter preparations. For 56%, the package information leaflet is a frequent source of information about the over-the-counter drugs used. The respondents consider over-the-counter preparations to be particularly suitable for (preventive) treatment of colds, flu symptoms, and pain management. The widespread perception of over-the-counter drugs as simple to use (62%), low-dose (69%), and low-efficacy (73%) products does not always correspond to the actual capabilities and risks of over-the-counter self-medication. Given the easy availability of over-the-counter drugs and their strong presence in advertising, it is important that patients have a realistic idea of the capabilities and risks of over-the-counter products. In addition to the advice provided by pharmacists, the trusting, long-standing support provided by GPs and their ongoing information and advice services play a central role in this. It would be advisable to give more attention to this public health concern and to promote initiatives to make patients more aware of the risks regarding consumption of drugs without medical consultation.

Experiences with Innovation Fund healthcare models in primary care: a qualitative study amongst German general practitioners.

The Innovation Fund was set up in 2015 with the aim of improving medical care in the German statutory health insurance system. Primary care needs to be involved in testing interventions and new forms of care for effectiveness and inclusion in standard care. There has so far been hardly any research on how far Innovation Fund models accommodate the primary care setting, or on the experience general practitioners have had with these models. Between September 2021 and January 2022, 36 semi-standardized individual interviews were performed with general practitioners who had already participated in Innovation Fund projects. Eleven regional physician networks in Rhineland-Palatinate, Hesse, North Rhine-Westphalia, and Schleswig-Holstein were involved in the recruitment process. Most of the interviewees associated the Innovation Fund with potential and opportunity including intensification of application-oriented healthcare research, independent financing, and general healthcare involvement. Even so, many general practitioners were unsure as to how far primary care in particular would stand to benefit from the Innovation Fund in the long term. A mostly positive balance was drawn from participation in care models-benefit of intervention as well as cost-benefit ratio. However, some also reported hurdles and stress factors such as documentation requirements and disruption in everyday office routine. Innovation Fund projects will need to be suitable for general practitioners especially regarding medical decision-making leeway, limits to documentation requirements, preserving established office routine, greater involvement in research planning, and improvements to the primary care setting to encourage willingness to participate in Innovation Fund projects amongst general practitioners.

Evaluation of elevated liver values in primary care - a series of studies on the status quo of care in Germany with special reference to alcoholic liver disease.

BACKGROUND: In primary care, elevated liver values often appear as incidental findings. As well considering the presenting symptoms, key factors in effective diagnosis are which liver values to include as indicators and when to refer patients for further diagnostics. It is also important that there is coordinated collaboration between GPs and specialists. There has hitherto been a lack of reliable findings on the status quo regarding the evaluation of (abnormally) elevated liver values in primary care. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, four written explorative surveys of GPs and gastroenterological specialists were conducted in various German states, aimed at taking stock of the current status of GP-based diagnostics of (abnormally) elevated liver values. In addition, interviews were conducted with 14 GPs and gastroenterological specialists. This review article discusses the overall findings of the series of studies in a condensed manner at a higher level. The article aims to derive starting points for optimising the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis in primary care. RESULTS: There are various challenges and problems associated with the evaluation of elevated liver values. For example, GPs draw on very different laboratory parameters, which are combined in different clusters. When elevated liver values are found, a majority of GPs prefer a controlled wait-and-see period, but often make use of direct referrals to specialists due to diagnostic uncertainties. GPs report interface problems with gastroenterological specialists, which are associated, among other things, with the preliminary evaluation that has been made and the timing of referral. Both GPs and specialists consider the introduction of an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm to be an important starting point for improving early detection and better coordination between healthcare levels. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts should be made to contribute to greater professionalisation and standardisation of primary care diagnostics and to better structure the interaction with gastroenterological specialists. These include a wider range of training formats, the development of a validated diagnostic pathway and the mandating of a liver function test as part of the check-up. The development of a GP-based guideline for managing elevated liver values also seems advisable.

[The German Innovation Fund and primary care-What expectations and experiences do general practitioners have with regard to participating in innovative care models?] / Innovationsfonds und Primärversorgung ­ Welche Erwartungen und Erfahrungen vertreten Hausärzt*innen in Bezug auf die Teilnahme an innovativen Versorgungsmodellen?

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the German Innovation Fund was established to promote improvements in the quality of medical care. In order for new care models and interventions to be tested and incorporated into standard care in the future, primary care must be included. OBJECTIVES: The study explores general practitioners' (GPs') attitudes, participation-relevant expectations, and experiences with regard to Innovation Fund projects. METHODS: Between July and October 2021, all 13,170 general practitioners in Baden-Württemberg, Hesse, and Rhineland-Palatinate were invited to take part in an online survey. Included in the evaluation were 3556 completed questionnaires (response rate: 27%). In addition to the descriptive analysis, a t-test on independent samples was used to determine significant differences between two groups. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 83% were familiar with the Innovation Fund. Most of the respondents associate it with opportunities and potential (including intensification of application-oriented healthcare research, independent financing, and inclusion of primary care). Nevertheless, many GPs are unsure to what extent primary care can benefit from the Innovation Fund in the longer term. When it comes to willingness to participate in Innovation Fund studies, the respondents are divided. Respondents who have already participated in such projects (24%) draw a positive balance (benefit of the intervention, cost-benefit ratio). However, hurdles and stress factors are also reported, such as documentation requirements and interventions in practice processes. CONCLUSIONS: In order to increase the attractiveness of the Innovation Fund for GPs, it is important to ensure that projects are fully compliant with primary care, especially with regard to the scope of medical decision-making, the limitation of documentation obligations, the guarantee of practice routines, a greater involvement in research planning, and an upgrading of the GP setting.

Slowing dementia symptoms - a qualitative study on attitudes and experiences of general practitioners in Germany.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no cure for dementia but general practitioners (GPs) have therapeutic options available to counteract the progression of mild cognitive impairment, including drug and non-drug treatment. So far, few studies have investigated treatment strategies preferred by GPs. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to gain an overview of GPs' attitudes towards influencing the progression of dementia, their involvement regarding dementia prevention and perceived effective approaches. It also elucidated the challenges experienced by GPs and desired optimisation measures towards reinforcing secondary prevention. METHODS: Between June 2020 and March 2021, 64 semi-standardised interviews amongst GPs were conducted in all federal states of Germany. Thirty interviews were carried out in person and 34 by phone. The data were analysed according to qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Many interviewees see great importance in secondary dementia prevention and believe they could make an effective contribution, some of them using non-drug approaches. GPs play a role in guiding patients and relatives towards support services. Some doctors consider drug treatment as the only option towards influencing the progression of dementia, showing low expectations on self-efficacy. Interdisciplinary collaboration is a frequent challenge, which often conflicts with a coherent treatment strategy. CONCLUSION: Many GPs feel confident about influencing the progression of dementia and believe they can intervene effectively, using various (non-drug) treatment measures and referrals to support services. GPs perceive challenges, including obstacles in interdisciplinary collaboration and negative impacts after drug administration. To improve the conditions for GP intervention, it depends on expanding interdisciplinary collaboration and care strategies.

[Team players or lone fighters? Importance and utilization of practice staff in primary care dementia detection]. / Teamgeist statt Einzelkämpfer? ­ Stellenwert und Nutzung des Praxispersonals bei der hausärztlichen Demenzerkennung.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GP) face major challenges in everyday practice when it comes to identifying dementia cases as early as possible under the condition of time and resource constraints. The involvement of the practice staff promises decisive advantages in detection and diagnosis. So far, there has been a lack of studies exploring the extent to which non-medical practice employees in general practices are integrated into dementia detection, what experiences they have had and how they assess their own potential to contribute to more efficient dementia detection. METHODS: Between August 2020 and August 2021, a total of 64 semi-structured, audio-technically recorded individual / expert interviews were conducted with non-medical practice employees (medical assistants) in general practices in all German federal states (four interviewees per federal state). The interview transcripts were evaluated using a qualitative, structuring content analysis according to Mayring (Software MAXQDA 2020). RESULTS: The GP team members show a high degree of willingness and motivation to support the doctor in identifying and diagnosing dementia; situations have been reported where their assistance has led to an earlier identification of people with dementia. Observation and detection of dementia patients are rarely based on systematic criteria. On the whole, only some GPs entrust their staff with tasks like this. A large portion of the interviewees expressed considerable uncertainty regarding the assessment of possible signs of incipient dementia, which corresponds to the fact that only a minority of the interviewees have ever completed further training with a focus on dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Practice staff can provide invaluable support when it comes to the timely and consistent detection of incipient dementia in general practice. In addition to sensitizing GPs and optimizing practice management, targeted training with regard to geriatric issues will be instrumental in achieving this. Accordingly, more advanced training formats should be developed that are tailored to the perspective of practice employees and convey important dementia-specific diagnostics, action and communication skills.

[Evaluation of abnormal liver chemistries in primary care - A survey on the prerequisites, procedure and challenges faced by general practitioners]. / Diagnostik erhöhter Leberwerte in der hausärztlichen Versorgung ­ Eine Befragung zu Voraussetzungen, Vorgehen und erlebten Herausforderungen von Allgemeinmedizinern.

INTRODUCTION: In primary care, abnormal liver chemistries are often being diagnosed unintentionally. In addition to paying attention to symptoms, it is crucial for an effective clarification which liver values are taken into account as indicators and when patients are referred for further diagnostics. It is also important to have a functioning collaboration between GPs and specialists. To date, there are hardly any current findings about the procedure and the challenges experienced by GPs in German-speaking countries when it comes to clarifying increased liver values. METHODS: In the course of a survey based on several preliminary studies, a total of 2,701 GPs in Hesse and Baden-Württemberg were interviewed between October 2019 and March 2020. The focus was on behavior and strategies with regard to the clarification of elevated liver values. In addition to the descriptive analysis, a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: The results show various challenges and problems that primary care is confronted with in everyday practice. There are very different clusters with regard to paying attention to warning signs as well as liver values that are being analyzed in the course of a liver function test. In the case of increased liver values, 59 % of the physicians surveyed generally prefer a controlled waiting. Nevertheless, many GPs refer patients with elevated liver values directly to gastroenterological specialists (66 %). The doctors surveyed experience various interface problems in working with gastroenterological specialists. DISCUSSION: It seems sensible to take measures that contribute to greater professionalization and standardization of primary care diagnostics and to a more structured cooperation with gastroenterological specialists. These include, for example, a broader range of training and further education formats, the development of a validated diagnostic pathway for classifying and evaluating elevated liver enzymes (especially early detection of patients at increased risk for liver fibrosis or liver cirrhosis) or the establishment of a liver function screening as part of the general medical check-up. The development of a GP-based guideline for dealing with increased liver values should be followed up.

[General practitioners, attitudes, procedures and challenges towards supporting family caregivers - results of a survey of primary care physicians]. / Hausärztliche Einstellungen, Vorgehensweisen und Herausforderungen bei der Unterstützung pflegender Angehöriger ­ Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Allgemeinmediziner*innen.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners are considered to be well suited when it comes to addressing the information and care needs of family caregivers. The aim of the present study is to examine how general practitioners assess their possibilities to support caregivers, what priorities they set and to what extent they experience challenges. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: In the course of an online survey with a postal cover letter, a total of 3,556 GPs in in Baden-Württemberg, Hesse and Rhineland-Palatinate were interviewed between February and June 2021. Due to the exploratory approach of the study, only a descriptive data analysis was carried out. RESULTS: 68 % of the GPs surveyed often deal with family caregivers in everyday practice; 77 % consider the GP's office to be well suited as the primary point of contact for family caregivers and care coordination. Often it is caregiving relatives who ask the GP about the issue of care (89 %). Frequent contents concern a deterioration in the care situation (75 %) and a change in the need for care (84 %); consultations in the initial phase of care are less common (40 %). There are differences between urban and rural doctors in the perception of the needs of caregivers and the setting of priorities. Rural doctors give more weight to proactive and psychosocial care, whereas doctors in urban regions rely on the specialist and support network. GPs experience various challenges while supporting caregivers, including the timely organization of suitable relief offers (87 %), the referral to suitable offers of help (79 %) or the early identification of informal caregivers (59 %). DISCUSSION: GPs can play a central role in supporting family caregivers. A crucial prerequisite for this is that family caregivers are recognized and involved at an early stage. Consistent references to offers of help make it easier for family caregivers to organize care and to receive (psychosocial) support. In addition, it is important that GPs take into account the needs, desires and stresses of both caregivers and those being cared for.

Prerequisites for providing effective support to family caregivers within the primary care setting - results of a study series in Germany.

BACKGROUND: General Practitioners are considered to be well placed to monitor home-care settings and to respond specifically to family caregivers. To do this, they must be sensitive to the needs and expectations of caregivers. In order to determine the current status of GP care in terms of the support given to family caregivers, a series of studies were conducted to gather the perspectives of both caregivers and GPs. The results are used to derive starting points as to which measures would be sensible and useful to strengthen support offered to family caregivers in the primary care setting. METHODS: Between 2020 and 2021, three sub-studies were conducted: a) an online survey of 612 family caregivers; b) qualitative interviews with 37 family caregivers; c) an online survey of 3556 GPs. RESULTS: Family caregivers see GPs as a highly skilled and trustworthy central point of contact; there are many different reasons for consulting them on the subject of care. In the perception of caregivers, particular weaknesses in GP support are the absence of signposting to advisory and assistance services and, in many cases, the failure to involve family caregivers in good time. At the same time, GPs do not always have sufficient attention to the physical and psychological needs of family caregivers. The doctors interviewed consider the GP practice to be well suited to being a primary point of contact for caregivers, but recognise that various challenges exist. These relate, among other things, to the timely organisation of appropriate respite services, targeted referral to support services or the early identification of informal caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: GP practices can play a central role in supporting family caregivers. Caregivers should be approached by the practice team at an early stage and consistently signposted to help and support services. In order to support care settings successfully, it is important to consider the triadic constellation of needs, wishes and stresses of both the caregiver and the care recipient. More training and greater involvement of practice staff in the support and identification of caregivers seems advisable.